Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Does the presence and amount of epinephrine in 2% lidocaine affect its anesthetic efficacy in the management of symptomatic maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis?

Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2022³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.39 ~ 47
Singla Mamta, Gugnani Megha, Grewal Mandeep S., Kumar Umesh, Aggarwal Vivek,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Singla Mamta ) - SGT Dental College Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics
 ( Gugnani Megha ) - SGT Dental College Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics
 ( Grewal Mandeep S. ) - SGT Dental College Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics
 ( Kumar Umesh ) - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Division of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Aggarwal Vivek ) - Jamia Millia Islamia Faculty of Dentistry Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics

Abstract


Background: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial that aimed to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine combined with different concentrations of epinephrine (plain, 1:200,000 and 1:80,000) during endodontic treatment of maxillary molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Methods: The trial included 144 adult patients who were randomly allocated to three treatment groups. All patients received buccal-plus-palatal infiltration. After 10 min, pulp sensibility testing was performed using an electric pulp test (EPT). If a tooth responded positively, anesthesia was considered to have failed. In the case of a negative EPT response, endodontic access was initiated under rubber dam isolation. The success of anesthesia was defined as having a pain score less than 55 on the Heft Parker visual analog scale (HP VAS), which was categorized as ¡®no pain¡¯ or ¡®faint/weak/mild¡¯ pain on the HP VAS. Baseline pre-injection and post-injection maximum heart rates were recorded. The Pearson chi-square test was used to analyze the anesthetic success rates at 5% significance.

Results: Plain 2% lidocaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1:80,000 epinephrine had anesthetic success rates of 18.75%, 72.9%, and 82.3%, respectively. Statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the groups (P < 0.001, ¥ö2 = 47.5, df = 2). The maximum heart rate increase was seen with 2% lidocaine solution with epinephrine.

Conclusion: Adding epinephrine to 2% lidocaine significantly improves its anesthetic success rates during the root canal treatment of maxillary molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Å°¿öµå

Anesthesia; Buccal Administration; Epinephrine; Irreversible Pulpitis; Lidocaine; Maxilla

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI